Defending Against DUI And Criminal Charges
In Illinois Since 1986

Rated By | Super Lawyers | Donald J. Ramsell | 10 Years
Super Lawyers
Recommended By Peers For | Leading Lawyers Network | The Top Lawyers
Avvo Rating | 10.0 | Superb | Top Attorney | DUI
DCBA | DuPage County Bar Association Member
National College For DUI Defense | General Member
Avvo | Clients Choice | 2012 | DUI
Preeminent | AV | LexisNexis | Martindale-Hubbell | Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards And Legal Ability
  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Uncategorized
  4.  » Clash over special prosecutor in complicated DUI case – Aurora Beacon News

Clash over special prosecutor in complicated DUI case – Aurora Beacon News

On Behalf of | Aug 31, 2012 | Uncategorized |

On Thursday, Kane County Judge Thomas Stanfa told attorneys he would hear arguments over the appointment of a special prosecutor in the DUI case of John Holdren of Aurora.

Court records show the Kane County state’s attorney’s office was surprised by Stanfa’s decision on Aug. 20 to appoint a special prosecutor to handle Holdren’s case. Holdren’s attorney requested one be brought in because of what she considers a conflict stemming from a July 13 courthouse incident she says was witnessed by an assistant state’s attorney. The disagreement over who should prosecute is part of what has become an increasingly complicated case.

According to court records, an Aurora police officer stopped Holdren near Galena Boulevard and West Park Place around 5:30 p.m. on May 22. The officer wrote in the DUI complaint that Holdren, 67, had glassy, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech and smelled of alcohol. Holdren registered a .147 blood-alcohol content level — the legal limit in Illinois is .08 — and told the officer he had two or three glasses of wine, records state.

The officer gave Holdren a warning to motorist, which includes information about a mandatory summary suspension of his drivers license, but failed to enter two dates required by the Illinois Secretary of State’s Office. An official there, in a letter dated May 31, notified police and the Kane County Circuit Clerk that Holdren could not have his license suspended because of the errors, documents show.

The attorney claims the officer, who has not been charged with any wrongdoing, approached Holdren after that hearing and “made derogatory and threatening comments to him in the presence of witnesses,” a motion for sanctions states. The attorney  said an assistant state’s attorney witnessed the incident. On July 24, the officer filed a new warning to motorist, with the word “amended” written in the upper left corner and couched by asterisks. The amended version included the two dates which were missing from the original notice filled out two months earlier. The attorney  says the officer re-filed the paperwork knowing the original suspension had been voided, but did it to harass Holdren.Clash over special prosecutor in complicated DUI case – Aurora Beacon News.